Charters--Drain or draw?
"We're so far beyond reason at this point. Even the media are picking up on the special interest rhetoric:
"Charters are siphoning money from the district."
Siphoning? You mean they are sticking a hose in and pulling it out involuntarily?? Money belongs to all of us, and charters are entitled to public funds to educate public kids no less than a school district.
"Charters are draining money from the budget."
Who’s draining what? Aren’t kids leaving because the think they’ll do better in another school? Maybe it’s really the parents that are draining the budget, in which case, you’d be picking on the parents. Not a good move, is it?
Here’s a better way to look at it, courtesy of the Gary, Indiana Post Tribune , April 11:
"Parents are showing their disenchantment with their feet. They’re walking away in droves from the city’s traditional public schools and toward newly created public charter schools. They say they’re looking for safer schools, smaller class sizes, and a better academic foundation."
Draining? I think not. These parents, and the thousands like them nationwide, are working for their kids, not the system. It costs us all when we don’t educate children. We should applaud when we find ways to keep people attending public schools, and if that costs the district funds they’d otherwise love to keep, maybe they need to act and stop complaining.
Until then, when you hear that charters are costing someone money, remember who pays for the schools and why they are supposed to exist. Money is for education, not just to perpetuate a system or jobs or programs that may not work for every child. If kids are leaving, it’s safe to say that there’s a problem. Thank God there are parents who care enough to buck the status quo."

